Rejection strategies in American political debates: A Pragma- linguistic Study

This study attempts to investigate the strategies of rejection in arena political debates. The main challenge dealing with pragmatically lies idea that is divided into two types: Explicit or Implicit. As such, tries identify implicit pragma-linguistic American debaters employ arguments their opponents. Furthermore, it highlights these indirect have been utilized more frequently by so as serve agendas. Moreover, pinpoints stage at which process takes place.
 Thus, qualitative uses an eclectic model primarily based on previous studies conducted field argumentation ( Van Eemeren & Grootendrorst, 2018) strategies. has concluded offensive than defensive tactics defend positions and reject those a result, they make effort discredit opinions opponents variety ways such accusations, insulting, criticizing, denial, condemning. It noted rejecting standpoint initiated within developing stage. can be viewed essence viewpoints are defended rejected.